Researcher Bias

Case Selection

 Researcher Bias

According to Douglass and Moustakas (1984), the first phase in any qualitative study, the researcher must look at her bias and preconceived notions of what she will find before she begins her research. Here I had to look at my preconceptions and attempt to gain clarity of vision. According to Ihde (1977), this requires that looking precede judgment and that judgment of what it 'real' or 'most real' be suspended until all the evidence (or at least sufficient evidence) is in (p. 36). When I began this research, I believed that first-year composition students did not perform as well in terms of course completion as those in the traditional classroom due to my own experiences. However, the literature available does not support this. Thus, I attempted to find evidence that proved otherwise. This suspension of judgment allowed me to follow and hear what the students were truly saying to me.

The impetus for the study was my active and continued belief that computers are excellent tools for students. Since 1987, I have been using and promoting the use of computers. My interests and professional expertise with computers is manifold and has been both positive and productive. I regularly use email to correspond and exchange documents with colleagues. I have participated in several successful online collaborative projects and have been using electronic communication as a way for students to send weekly journal entries to me since 1991. Thereafter, I took every opportunity available to connect my students with the Internet.

Having had these experiences with using electronic teaching as a portion of some courses, I was led to teach entire courses online. Now I teach them regularly. In the Winter of 1998, I taught three different online English classes, technical writing, introductory literature, and first-year composition class, along with my other traditional classes. Although this bias was positive, it did not blind me to how computer use can be frustrating and non-productive.

Another bias that I brought to this research project was my interest and belief in active teaching and learning practices. Learners must be active participants in the construction of knowledge. With the vast amount of information available online, students need to discern and discriminate between differing sets of information. Thus, they must be given opportunities to engage in sense-making. Good learning situations require students to engage in their learning processes through experiential activities.

Throughout this process I also learned how critical it is to give students direction in their explorations of cyberworld, as stated previously, "the computer as writing space constitutes a new writing space with qualities unlike those of previous space of handwriting and printing" (Bolter, 1991, p. 17). Most students can find a plethora of ways to waste time with chatlines and multi-player dungeon and dragon games, instead of gathering information pertinent to their lives. As Dyrli and Kinnaman (1996) reminded us the newness of an experience often supercedes structure. Yet, I believed, and still believe, that an educator's duty is to facilitate student self-discipline, critical reasoning, and discernment into a productive avenue.

 

Subsections of Chapter III in Order of Apperance
[Research Design] [Data Analysis] [Embedded Units] [Limitations of Study]
[Researcher Bias] [Interpretive Method] [Case Selection]
[Methological Assumptions]

 Hit Counter
Home

Write to Jan -- jan@js.spokane.wa.us

Last Updated 10/20/01
These pages designed, maintained and copyrighted by Jan Strever, © 2001.