Assignment Three Overview
The tasks were varied and many for this assignment:
1. Choose a
topic, post it and respond to everyone's topic.
2. Read three
chapters in the text.
3. Write a
scenario, post and respond to peer scenarios.
4. Write three
paragraphs of pro argument, post and respond to peers.
5. Write three
paragraphs, post, and respond.
6. Write a
first draft, post and respond.
7. Write a
second draft, post and respond.
8. Write and
post a final draft.
At this point in the class, one would assume the mechanism of
delivery should be unseen. Yet, as the class began the most ambitious projects thus far,
many problems arose.
Difficulties in Interpretation of
Assignments. Since argument is the most complex assignment given to first-year
composition students, questions should be raised by them, especially those who are lower
skilled (Hayes & Brandt, 1992). Thus it is not surprising that immediately after
receiving the assignment, Sue wrote, "This paper seems pretty difficult. I am having
trouble undrstanding." She followed this with a list of twelve questions, ranging
from questions about the topic to questions of vocabulary. Monica then stated, "I had
the same problems with Sue." In response, the teacher sent another message through to
the class. In it, he made use of bullets and white space to help students understand what
he wanted from them. After that, he received no more questions.
Reading and Understanding Online Text.
Monica had trouble reading and understanding the assignment. She wrote, "After I read
the desription for the writing assignment #3, it is more confusing then I thought
the
information have to current. I am wondering what year or date do you mean by
current?" Her verbalization of this and other students' comments led the instructor
to write, "My guess is that many of you aren't reading my comments and responses to
individuals. Please go back and read all the messages I've sent to individuals in
class." Since the instructor was new to this type of instruction, it is not
surprising that it had taken him this long to understand that some students have
difficulty with reading and understanding online text.
"Etalk"
Versus Rhetoric. In another first for the instructor, he began to become more
informal in some of his messages to his students, as indicated by using lower case letters
when addressing them, and when signing his name as evidenced in messages such as this,
"julie, this is an excellent topic. there are a number of outrageous proposals for
you to consider; here are a few
j."
Problems of
Unstructured Time and the "Newness". Some students still had difficulties
with having the discipline required of an online student. Robert, knowing of his own
predilection, wrote, "hi everyone, i know, late as usual. The lab is going to close
soon so here is my topic." Steve did not make excuses when he quipped, "You
guys, I'm sorry for turning my paper in so late. No excuses here. Just a VERY bad week.
Mahalo." Sue also had difficulties, "My scenario which was dated for March 6 was
sent to the class incomplete. I couldn't finish it before the lab closed. I just turned in
whatever I had." Students were quite aware when the computer labs were opened and
closed; thus, this showed poor planning on their parts.
Method of
Delivery: Technology. The largest problem area was in the technology of the class.
Again and again, students had trouble with email, with being pushed offline, and with
email not arriving when and how it was supposed to. Steve, in response to numerous
complaints from others, wanted to know who else had trouble with reading his email,
I would like to know, if
all of you have the same problem with my e-mail. If so, I will switch to another e-mail
software. The one I am currently using is capable of supporting [HTML] codes therefore
enableing me to go to links and attributes to the INTERNET or WWW directly from my e-mail.
Please send me your input, then I will either make a switch, or get information to you on
how to decipher my gibberish.
The responses were immediate. Carl
responded,
YEAH,
DUDE, I CAN'T READ YOUR E-MAIL WORTH #@#^%*!? TO READ IT AT ALL I HAVE TO FIRST REPLY AND
INCLUDE YOU MESSAGE . . . EVEN AFTER THAT, IT'S FULL OF ALL THESE nbsp; nbsp; nbsp; !!! It
pretty much kinda sucks . . . TRY SENDING YOURSELF A E-MAIL THAT YOU ACCESS ON CAMPUS . .
. SEE WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE FROM THERE . . . ALL I KNOW IS THAT IT DON'T WORK FOR ME. THANKS
FOR ASKIN
Steve took action. "Hey class, is this any better. I from my
current e-mail browser to Eudora Light version 3. something or other. Let me know if this
makes a difference." He also took charge when a possible virus surfaced, sending the
following to the group, "Fwd: fwd: Re: VIRUS ALERT -Reply - Forwarded (fwd)."
This message detailed what the virus was and what solutions the students should take to
protect themselves.
Robert's email problem was different; he received a message from
the computer services, "Hi Robert, There were some errors in the alias e100-l, so
your mail got bounced to us. The problem has been fixed, you might want to resend the
message to the group." So was Rhonda's, "OH S T . . . . THE COPY PASTE
FUNCTION DOESN'T CATCH QUOTATION MARKS! SORRY! I WILL FIX THAT BEFORE I TURN IN MY
FD." Sue also didn't know some of the commands necessary to operate her email
efficiently, "I don't know how to save info when I'm in the email mode."
Another concern was with down time. Rachel wrote, "I tried to
send my paper on Tuesday, but we had a major power outage. I have had problems with this
computer all day." Cassandra advised, "I am sorry that my comments come today
rather than yesterday. It is because I did my howework at home and was unable to get
through to unix server." She restated in the next email, "I apologise for the
delay for the same reason as given in my previous message." Of the 30 messages about
online technology (of 167 in this section), only one commented upon a positive aspect.
Melinda ventured, "I searched the net and found a group of schools where there is no
"structure" and everything is run democratically," as finding this
information aided her in her search for an argument topic.
Because of the difficulty of the assignment, the least skilled
students should have had more problems than the more skilled students in discovering
topics for this papers (Elbow, 1988; Emig, 1979; White, 1985), and that was the case for
this assignment. However, what was interesting to note is only Cassandra and Carl seemed
to handle the project without much trouble. All of the rest struggled. First they
struggled with brainstorming and then with attitude.
Monica fluctuated between various topics and ideas, from smoking,
same sex marriage, teachers and gambling; she finally settled on gambling, but the effort
was painful. A message submitted to the class, "I don't think I can send in my draft
by tonight, because I don't have a clue what I am going to write. I am sure I will try to
send it in by Saturday. Sorry for the delay :-(."
Sue suffered the same pangs. She, too, had trouble developing a
topic. "I'm still not sure what I should write about. I'm considering understanding
and being aware of people's disabilities, or closing down bars, strip clubs to prevent
fights and deaths. HELP!!!!!" Dr. Sutherland intervened at this point,
Sue,
two excellent subjects. To address the problem of under employment for those with
disabilities, you could propose that all private and public sector organizations be forced
to hire people with disabilities -- no exceptions. The second idea is a good one. To
address the problem of violence that's associated with bars and nightclubs, you could
propose that all of them be closed.
Fifteen minutes later, Sue wrote, "Now I'm thinking about
littering. Because that bothers me very much. What do you guys think?" Twenty minutes
after that, without any more impetus from an outside source, she amended, "I've
decided to do my topic on violence that's associated with bars, nightclubs." Here we
see someone someone in the throes of the process of the reflexive mode. The teacher must
have realized his extensive comments might interfere with her writing processes as he
wrote, "I think I'm 'talking too much.' I'd better step aside and give your
classmates a chance to give you feedback. Class?"
Rhonda had the same dilemma; she couldn't settle on a topic. First,
she wrote, "For assignment #3, I am going to write about the problem of nuclear
activity in the Pacific," and when it came time to write her scenario, she said,
"Well, i really couldn't do the scenario assignment on time. No way jose!!! So, now i
will just freewrite for you and tell you what i think. This assignment doesn't make much
sense to me, but i'll try."
Julie had the same trouble; she telegraphed to the class in her
email, "I think I'll do my paper on teenage pregnancy or drugs and alcohol that
affect teens. Is one or the other a good topic? Help!" Even though the teacher had
made the decision to not "talk too much," she received a long message from him,
julie, this is an
excellent topic. there are a number of outrageous proposals for you to consider; here are
a few:
1. any teen
who uses drugs or alcohol during her pregnancy will immediately be sent to a special
hospital-jail where she can be monitored for the rest of her pregnancy
2. the guilty
teen mother will be forced to carry a large sign announcing that she was caught taking
drugs/alcohol during pregnancy, and she must be out on the street during the busiest
traffic hours and in shopping malls
I'm sure the class can think of some other wild
ideas.
Julie's next message indicated the problem
still existed, "Everyone: I won't be able to email you my scenario #3 probably by
Sunday. I'll try to get it in as soon as I can. I really don't know what to talk about or
how to write it yet."
Steve, too, had much turmoil with the assignment. He told the
class, "Hey gang. Wassup again. My subject is something along the lines of gang
violence, and what a concerned society can do to rid themselves of over zealous,
testosterone filled, adolescence." His confidence is displayed here, but later on he
wrote, when submitting his last draft late, "I am losing my focus on all things,
including my passion for writing. I promise to be re-motivated and re-focused before the
start of the next assignment." None of the messages between his preceding one and
this one gave insight to this loss of trust in his writing processes. However, if we
recall that Steve's skill does not match his self-assessment, then that may inform his
loss of confidence, especially when he received this personal message via the class
discussion board from his instructor.
Keep
your arguments separate from the scenario. State your 3 pro arguments and develop them in
separate paragraphs. State your 3 con arguments and develop them in separarte parags.
Finally, rebut the 3 con arguments. Each rebuttal can be attached to its con argument.
This list of tasks to do may have seemed
just too overwhelming to a fledging writer. Attempting to address Steve's distress, Carl
wrote, enlarging upon his own reflexive mode,
Here's
what I do when faced with a writing assignment . . . (IT MAY NOT WORK FOR YOU, BUT YOU
COULD CONSIDER IT . . .) What I try to do-wheather it is a Philosophy, History or English
paper, is to figure out what the assignment is first and foremost. It is soooeasy to get
off on a tangent and miss the boat, so to speak. The second thing, is to TRY to find some
aspect of the assignment that interests you; gets your blood boiling, or reminds you of
something you feel passionately. It's not easy. But if you try to write before you have a
good subject, uou'll be desperate for words; counting the pages, and trying to find the
largest FONT for your paper just to fill space. Asking for help is your strongest asset,
in my opinion. Just take it easy on yourself, think of something fun, and freewrite
awhile. It'll come.
After reading Steve's attempt at the assignment, Carl understood
the dilemma: we can't write well what we don't understand.
Not surprisingly, many students did not complete all of these
tasks. In fact, only four managed to complete a final draft: Carl finished his on time
--Melinda, Steve and Rhonda turned them in late. While everyone did post a topic, a
scenario, and a response to the readings, no one read and responded to all of the numerous
postings.
Indeed this was a problem as indicated by Dr. Sutherland's
reprimand, titled, "Class Please Read." He told students that they needed to
read every message from him, "Thus, from now on, please read all the messages that I
send -- even if it's not addressed to you."
From that point on, each message he sent to a student was labeled,
PLEASE READ. In addition, in a message a few days later, he again reprimanded them,
attempting to push them into responding more. "Some of you have remained silent. I
hope it's not because you don't value your classmates' suggestions. The quality of RD3
will tell us how effective peer comments have been."
It was also during this time period that Dr. Sutherland returned
their first graded papers. When he did so, he included two different handouts which
explained the scoring system and grading policies (Appendix C).
Communication activity was low during Assignment Three, implying
students were so busy with their tasks that they had difficulties with staying in touch
with each other. An added complexity was midterm. Many students had to prepare for exams
and papers in other classes. Julie stated, "Sorry, I won't be able to email my FD3
yet, I'll give it until tomorrow night. I've been soooooo tied up with midterms!"
Rhonda wrote,
It all started on
Wednesday. I studied for a mid-term until 4 a.m. Thursday morning. I had class all day.
Then I had a Student Congress meeting. Then my body shut down. I slept until 9 a.m. on
Friday. Then I finished my paper for History. Then I worked until 1 a.m. Saturday morning.
Now it's Saturday, almost 4 p.m. I have to be to work by 5:30. I have had problems with
this computer all day. There is no way that I can finish my FD3 by midnight, because I
won't get off work until 1 again. And I work tomorrow morning. So, my paper will be late.
I do have some very good ideas about it, though. Just give me a few more days.
Carl had the most messages when it came to communicating with the
class. After responding to drafts and topics, he would add quips, "Time for my
Geritol; have a nice day," and "Ho! Time for my prozak. Carl:-) (lil'old joke @
the prozak)." He was the only one who seemed to be able to cope with the assignment,
which is not surprising since he was the highest skilled writer in the class. While the
class discussion suffered, feedback did not.
During Assignment Three students made some progress from
correctness to revision comments. For example, when Monica submitted her ideas a request
for help, "If gambling is suddenly legalized, there are many problems such as
economic, social, family, environments, and traffic problems that could arise. Please give
me any feedback that is this a good area to start with," many offered advice and
suggestions which helped her make decisions about her topic. Carl suggested, "Since
gambling is already legal but-beleive me-there's a ton of it here already, but illegal,
you could try a outregeous proposal to have anyone caught gambling EXECUTED." Monica
responded,
Carl gave me a very good
idea how to develop my paper. She talk about the state which can gambling, and talk about
the effect on that. I only went to Moscow gambled once, but I think write about Las Vegas
is more fun for this topic. I will compare Las Vegas has Casino to here which is banned on
gambling. This morning I read the newspaper, at home, they have a propsal to built a
casino. I am looking forward into this idea more deeply.
Other members, too, offered words of advice that led to revision,
rather than surface error correction. Rhonda seemed to actually become inspired by
Monica's topic, providing evidence for her,
I totally agree with you
on this subject!!! It is very upseting to see gambling coming here. For another example, I
will tell you about the Marshall Islands. They legalized gambling. And now, do you know
what has happened??? A company in South Korea wants to build 2 casino/resorts in M. These
places are very small. Some are only 1 or 2 blocks wide, and they are only about one foot
above sea level. There are about 20 atolls in M. One of the atolls is Mi. So, the South
Korean Company, and an American business man, Jerry Kramer, wants to move all of the M.
residents to a new home and use the land for a casino. It is really sickening. Another
idea that I have on this subject is: Many times a state will legalize gambling in order to
make money to support education and other good causes. I think it's really sick to be
teaching our kids that you have to be a gambling fool to go to school. In other words,
they should not have to use "wicked" money to keep our kids in school. Good
subject!
Since both Carl and Rhonda offered such excellent feedback, Sue's
corrective comments seemed shallow in comparison, "IS YOUR PLAN IMPLEMENTED IN HONG
KONG? CHECK GRAMMAR. MAYBE YOU SHOULD START OFF YOUR FIRST SENTENCE, IN THE FIRST
PARAGRAPH, WITH DIFFERENT WORDS. I LEARNED FROM MY ENG 22 CLASS, TO NEVER START A SENTENCE
WITH 'IT.'" Despite the productive feedback, Monica still had difficulty with the
assignment and as noted did not turn in a final draft.
Steve also received some valuable feedback. While Monica offered,
"Your Thesis statement is very effective .
. . point out what is your argument will be to get rid of the gang members," Rhonda
added,
Many gangs develop because
children do not have secure families. I don't think that the answer is to beat them up.
But I definetely agree that they should be stopped. I have alw3ays wondered what would
happen if they were completely ignored. How can a gang have any effect when it is not
recognized by anyone? I think this would only work with the kids, though. I mean, kids are
pretty easy to persuade. So, if they were given something better to do, and were not
recognized or feared as a gang, they would not have a gang. Adult gangs are more dangerous
and cannot be ignored, though. They probably just need to get knocked off. But the
question there is, "Who is the judge? Who gets to do the beating? And how will the
punisher win?" One thing you might want to consider, or discuss, is the fact that
gangs are so prevelent in European and American societies BECAUSE we have no strong
cultural or religious rites of passage. In other words, adolescents in America have an
incredibly difficult time understanding how to become an adult, because there are no set
guidelines! Great topic!!!
Carl, adding a lightness to the process,
suggested,
I
think your subject is really interesting. You could impliment people who would ID a gang
member and take "them out". First you could "rough them up a bit", or
possibly remove fingers for each violation or force them into 'Gang de-tox" and
brainwash them or perform some small lobodomy and give them manual labor jobs in farm
areas of northern Canada . . . :-) Seriously, fixing the problem with your "extreme
measures" will be fun to read about.
Of course, he, too, received
nonspecific feedback; Julie suggested, "I think it's a good idea to write about gang
violence. It seems like it's starting up everywhere now. This one should be
interesting."
Steve, however, resorted to corrective comments rather than
revisionist feedback when he wrote,
I
enjoyed this paper. It did seem a bit long, but I got the gist of it. I think you have a
great topic, a great solution, and hopfully a great grade for this paper . . .. I don't
think it would hurt this paper at all, if you pruned it just a tad bit though. Well, just
another thought.
Whereas the depth of feedback had increased, the suggestions and
words of encouragement decreased; when Steve vocalized his trouble, only Carl offered any
help, "Asking for help is your strongest asset, in my opinion." Other than that
occasion, students were reticent.
Little was offered in the way of personal details during this assignment. Rhonda shared
that she was running for "Student Congress for 97-98," along with her campaign
platform. She encouraged everyone to vote and even offered her suggestions for the best
candidates. In addition, she disclosed that she volunteered for a "group calles P.
and A. Center for Theology and Strategies (PACTS)" although she did not discuss the
group's purpose.
